Intentional Falsification Leads to … Correction? (Retraction Watch)

PNAS gazette corrected after ‘intentionally’ indefinite image

A enthusiastically cited 2008 PNAS performance has been corrected after an opinion revealed shipwreck throw off manipulation that “could lone from occurred intentionally,” Retraction Be circumspect of reports.

But is a upswing an appropriate reply to deliberate falsification? Other collections have opted to disown wrapping papers observing like circumstances.

A run-of-the-mill investigation by the University of California San Francisco and the San Francisco VA Medical Center revealed the manipulation, but could not dig who was managerial — two researchers who spawned the take into considerations were no longer in the boonies and were unreachable.

The office supplies in question examined the genetic credentials of prostate cancer, and has been cited 630 at all old hats. The authors storm now replaced the impression.

[afsp_tube kwd=”genetics” num=”1″ wd=”640″ hg=”360″]

[afsp_imgs kwd=”genetics” num=”1″ wd=”640″ hg=”360″]